davegee Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 I think that AbdolReza's original reasoning was to do with file size and on that basis he has an argument.HOWEVER, the problems arising out of the use of MIDI far outweigh the advantages. I, too, as previously stated agree with Igor - it is not required and is not desirable.DaveG Quote
Guest Techman1 Posted January 5, 2009 Report Posted January 5, 2009 Igor,I too would be fine with losing MIDI file support in PTE. As stated, we can always convert MIDI files to some other audio format and insert those into PTE. It sounds like a good plan and it is very thoughtful of you to ask everyone here.Good luck with the latest release and the future new release.All the best,Fred Quote
Igor Posted January 9, 2009 Author Report Posted January 9, 2009 Thanks for your responses.According most of opinions we will remove direct support of MIDI in the future version 5.7 and will add a converter from MIDI to MP3. Quote
kosheyar Posted January 9, 2009 Report Posted January 9, 2009 According most of opinions we will remove direct support of MIDI in the future version 5.7Igor NOOOOOOOOO Quote
kosheyar Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Thanks for your responses.According most of opinions we will remove direct support of MIDI in the future version 5.7Hi IgorDoesn't it better instead of removing direct support of MIDI in the future from version 5.7 , you produce two kind of product of PTE in the future :One for Windows Version such as XP , VISTA , Windows 7.0 , ...(Without removing direct support of MIDI ) = Download Windows versionAnother for Macintosh ,... (with removing direct support of MIDI ) = Download Mac OS X versionBecause be sure that in future It might you enter with any problems about running PTE in Macintosh version ,that you can't remove possibilities of pte only for some users of Macintosh . Sincerely Quote
Igor Posted January 18, 2009 Author Report Posted January 18, 2009 We're trying write as possible more common code of PicturesToExe for both versions - Windows and Mac. It vastly simplifies work on the program and reduces appearing of possible bugs. The more complex program the more we have to think about optimization of its code. Two programs (Windows and Mac) without common code is a true disaster for development. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.