Jump to content
WnSoft Forums

davegee

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    9,295
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    56

Everything posted by davegee

  1. Quite right Mike! But before we do could we ask Brian elaborate on what he means by "left on the books"? Does he mean available to download by those who already have a reg key or...... Available to purchase as a basic programme (complete with reg key)? DaveG
  2. RUGBY UNION. It's played by big guys with funny shaped balls. DaveG
  3. Congrats to Ireland - after 61 years they have something to celebrate this weekend!! DaveG
  4. So what you are trying to get is your 500x400 images (in original size) in a 1024x768 show with text comments and a Nav bar? Could I suggest that you use an older version - 5.1 will do what you want (you probably knew that). In Project Options / Screen tick "Disable Scaling" and click on "Set for existing slides". The loss of "Original Mode" has been the subject of MUCH discussion and your application is an excellent example of where it is needed most. There is another "workaround" which you could use (in 5.6) if you are sufficiently adept at using actions in Photoshop. Write an action to place your images in a 1024x768 (or whatever) black background and batch process all images using that action. That way your new 1024x768 images with 500x500 images inset would fit to screen in a 1024x768 show and maintain the 500x500 image size you require (and allow for the comments and nav bar). If you use black as a BG colour in PTE it would still allow for panning and rotating if you wish to use it. DaveG
  5. OK - you're in good hands now - I'm out. DaveG
  6. Use 500x500 for your "Fixed size of slide" (see my previous post) and that should sort you out. Your 500x400 and your 400x500 will "fit" to a 500x500 slide. "Fit to slide" is then the same as ORIGINAL. DaveG
  7. Debi, It is not altogether clear what you are trying to do - could you be specific? Are you trying to insert xxx number of slides all of the same resolution? Are they all different resolutions? If they are all the same then, in OPTIONS/SCREEN, you can set the size of slide to be equal to your image resolution and tick the "Fixed size of slides" box. That should enable you to insert xxx images at the set resolution as before. DaveG
  8. What is your screen's NATIVE (MAXIMUM) resolution? What was/is the resolution of the WINDOW which you say runs smoothly? Create another project with the same images and NO PZR effects and then - do you get smooth transitions in Full-Screen Mode? DaveG
  9. What is your screen's NATIVE (MAXIMUM) resolution? Is your screen running at its NATIVE (MAXIMUM) resolution? If not - what? (It SHOULD be set at its NATIVE (MAXIMUM) resolution. What was/is the resolution of the WINDOW which you say runs smoothly? Create another project with the same images and NO PZR effects and then - do you get smooth transitions in Full-Screen Mode? DaveG
  10. I think that the point to consider here is whether v4.49 is a different product or an earlier version. Microsoft, for instance, do not support earlier versions of their software although some are still in use i.e. Windows 98. If you were to persuade Igor to keep 4.49 available as a different product then he would have to support it? My opinion is that he would not want to do this and wants to move on. (I could be wrong). DaveG
  11. Ronnie's probably right about the number of people using 98 and 2000....... .....but Brian is also correct in that, if what he says is true, then it should be written into any instructions as an exception. DaveG
  12. Click on OPTIONS / Display Mode / STANDARD DaveG
  13. Dom, Version 2 plays fine on a 1920x1200 screen - no jegged edges. A question - What is the resolution of the original full screen images? DaveG
  14. From post #20: "I see no reason why the village hall who are requesting this would not be right in asking for it. Some do and others are not as aware of its implications. It is a bit like having your projector/laptop MOT'd annually - it is not invasive and takes literally minutes". DaveG
  15. If I understand you correctly - Slideshow.exe plays OK on your XP machine and you have burned it to a DVD? The DVD cannot be read on the VISTA machine? I think that you could possibly try to transfer the slideshow.exe to the Vista machine by some other means - memory key or USB drive - to see if it is the exe or the DVD which is causing your problem. DaveG
  16. Can you translate from the Finnish as accurately as possible? DaveG
  17. Can you drag (copy) the EXE file from the DVD to your desktop and run from there? DaveG
  18. John, Why don't you send a PM to Maureen - she might know where you can get the type of show that you are looking for? A list of such shows with their credits (what they have won) and where they could be downloaded would be a very valuable asset here. DaveG
  19. No need!! I have Howard Alden's banjo CD - that's virtuosity - but I still can't listen to more than one track at a time!! DaveG
  20. Thank the Lord for small mercies. I don't want to upset any Banjo players but I can only think of one thing that's worse - a violin in the hands of a raw beginner. Now Stephane Grappelli - that's a different matter. DaveG
  21. Hi Dom, I have tried the EXE and I'm experiencing some extremely jagged (stepped) edges on the white borders on my 1024x768 screen. I haven't tried it on my larger screens yet. DaveG
  22. Eric, The instrument that you described could have been a THEREMIN. MIDI music can be generated in two ways: Firstly by playing a piece on a MIDI keyboard or MIDI equipped guitar into a MIDI recording device which requires musical talent, or alternatively by entering notes one at a time into the recorder using a MIDI keyboard or guitar. Musical knowledge of timing and intervals is essential but given experience it is possible to come up with some good results. The first method can sound amateurish depending on your musical talent and the second USUALLY sounds very mechanical until you have practised MIDI for quite a long time. If you have time - then it is a great way to relax. DaveG
  23. In order to answer Brian's question more fully, albeit in layman's terms: The link here http://www.pat-testing.info/legal.htm sets out the legal requirement on the employer "Every employer shall ensure that work equipment is maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order and in good repair." In order to comply the employer must have a SCHEME which sets out the type and the frequency of tests he will make. This then becomes a STATUTORY DOCUMENT by which he must comply. Any insurance document will state that non-compliance will invalidate the insurance. In the case of Portable Appliances the type of testing will be PAT and the frequency depends on the nature of the equipment. A desktop computer might only need testing annually and a laptop / projector might be deemed to need 3 or 6 monthly testing. In either case it is the duty of the operator to examine the appliance daily to check for external problems such as damaged leads loose covers etc. HMI can also ask that the frequency be changed to a shorter period if he thinks it necessary (usually this arises out of an incident). The introduction to the above PAT advisory document also sets out the reasons for PAT: * 1. Where appliances are used by employees. * 2. Where the public may use appliances in establishments such as hospitals, schools, hotels, shops etc. * 3. Where appliances are supplied or hired. * 4. Where appliances are repaired or serviced. In the case of a repair on a third party's laptop / projector it can be seen that PAT would be required after the said repair in order to stay in compliance. Continued...... If you take your laptop / projector into a premises which is part of such a scheme then you have a responsibilty to comply with the scheme and the person who is asking for evidence of PAT on your equipment in advance is acting responsibly in giving you the opportunity to comply. A question that I would ask of that person is "What is the frequency of PAT required?" so that you are fully aware that you comply. Having a one year old PAT Certificate is of no use if the scheme requires 3 or 6 monthly testing. Brian's advice re ELCB's and RCD's is good advice and, PARTICULARLY in premises not covered by a scheme, is essential. However, in addition to ELCB's / RCD's etc, and where such a scheme is in force you MUST also provide proof that you comply with PAT when asked to do so. I have learnt over the years that: Anything that can happen, WILL happen..... and... Ignorance of the Law is not a defence in a Court of Law, Tribunal or INQUEST. DaveG
  24. http://www.pat-testing.info/legal.htm ....and see post #8 - it lasts for a year. DaveG
  25. Brian, Good advice, as always, but it does not absolve you from the legal requirement to PAT - in England, Scotland and Wales. DaveG
×
×
  • Create New...