Conflow Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Hi All,This may be of interest to a few Members who are exploring PNG-Image Technology because it has some excellentmerits and is used extensively in Commercial & Industrial applications for all all types of Imagery exchange.Here are some general facts:-1)If downloading Jpegs from Cameras those images should really be saved as PNG's for the reason that it is a"Losslesss-Format" and supports 48.Bit Colour whereas the JPeg is limited to 24.Bit Colour. If using RAW fromthe Camera there is no loss unlike JPegs where there is immediate loss.2)It is also use extensively in 'Post-Editing' of Images because of its 'Lossless' characteristics.3)When working in PNG's particularily when re-sizing Images - the max-compression factor is approx 3:1 (Lossless).4)If used with Fixed-Size Images when both are identical in Size (centimeters) the average compression fromPNG to JPeg is just on 6.5:1 ratio and rarely drops below 5:1 and then only with small Images ie: 300x200 pix.4)Another merit is when using Masks & Transparencies ~ the opacity factor is accurately adjustable from 0%~100%.5)Another feature when working in Numerals-Text-Objects and Line-Drawings ~ these are always sharp, no degradation.6)When working with "extra-large" Camera or Saved Images ~ its better to immediately convert these into PNG thenreduce the size to something managable ~work away on the smaller PNG Images~ then finally resize to JPeg as needed.With new modern Computers, PNG Image-Size is becomming a thing of the past as are the 'grudges' and misconceptionsabout this Technology. For those willing to experiment keep in mind the above facts and do read up on it with Answwers.Comand Wikipedia. You will certainly see the difference when making Video-Images in the smaller size formats.Brian (Conflow) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trailertrash Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Slightly off topic of reducing the size of png images, but just to present a different option I think you should consider 32 bit alpha channel bmp format instead of png. PTE will compress bmp images making the slideshows only slightly larger in .exe size with no loss in image quality.TomTom will the Bitmap format preserve the transparancy of the outer edge?Andrew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.