coopernatural Posted March 14, 2011 Report Posted March 14, 2011 All,Have uploaded to mediafire an AV ‘Above’.http://www.mediafire.com/?tqy19hqd4pb6atjWeighing in around 26 meg and lasting 4min 31 sec.Warning Contains mainly Christian religious imagery and if you think that may offend,don’t download.Think Sistene Chapel,Duomo,St.Peter’s Basilica etc.Featuring the elaborate artwork and carvings on walls and ceilings. I have used some long zooms/pans to capture the scale of the work.This is a presentation of the amazing artwork which I have tried to display respectfully.Davy Quote
colin hill Posted March 14, 2011 Report Posted March 14, 2011 Davy,That show was absolutely magnificent in my humble opinion. The music was spot on and your pans were very good.Thanks so much for sharing.Colin Quote
coopernatural Posted March 14, 2011 Author Report Posted March 14, 2011 Colin,Appreciate you watching and the feedback.It's hard to tell sometimes when working on an AV.All too easy to miss something,or get something wrong.Thanks,Davy Quote
Ken Cox Posted March 14, 2011 Report Posted March 14, 2011 DAVYit never ceases to amaze me the quality of your work - using the tools of pte,you presented the masterpieces properlyonly one frame looked a little washed out but one would have to see the original works firsthand to properly critque your showyou must be takin lessons from MP keep up the good workken Quote
rick235 Posted March 15, 2011 Report Posted March 15, 2011 Hi Davy,Nice job, the pans and zooms worked great for me and i think enhanced the whole show.Thanks Quote
coopernatural Posted March 15, 2011 Author Report Posted March 15, 2011 Ken,Well spotted with the washed out pic. I have updated things now.Original pic was pretty badly distorted/skewed off center etc,so I wasjust glad to get that sorted.This is the entrance to the Sistene Chapel. Lighting does not appear to bethat great in the pics I have seen and not many tourists will take the timeto compensate for the lighting.Thanks for keeping me right.Davy Quote
coopernatural Posted March 15, 2011 Author Report Posted March 15, 2011 Rick,Thanks for watching and the thumbs up with the pans and zooms.It's easy to overcook things.Davy Quote
dadou Posted March 15, 2011 Report Posted March 15, 2011 DavyVery well done ! Great work with these pictures !I imagine your patience with other visitors...I enjoyed very much this presentation !!!!!Regardsdaniel Quote
coopernatural Posted March 15, 2011 Author Report Posted March 15, 2011 Daniel,Glad that you enjoyed this.And thanks for watching.Images are via Google,so that saved on queuing upand air fare. Davy Quote
dpletts Posted March 16, 2011 Report Posted March 16, 2011 Hi Davy,Lovely to see another of your Google collections; most enjoyable. I liked the soundtrack a lot. Well done, keep up the good work.David P Quote
coopernatural Posted March 16, 2011 Author Report Posted March 16, 2011 Hi David,Thanks for watching and commenting.Just going to tweak a few of the images again.Thought you would like the soundtrack.I have been listening to the David P stuff again.Think I have a hitlist drawn up,but probably about a year's worth of Google imagesneeded trying to cover some of the soundscapes.140 bpm is into Video territory!Davy Quote
dpletts Posted March 16, 2011 Report Posted March 16, 2011 Your welcome, Davy.140 bpm is into Video territory!Please excuse my ignorance but I don't quite understand, or, to put it another way, "Eh"? David P Quote
coopernatural Posted March 16, 2011 Author Report Posted March 16, 2011 Sorry David,I should have explained better.I had been trying to work with some images set to some of your music.Just as a little tester.Like an ambient sudoko puzzle.I had drawn up a possible candidate list from your catalogue of about 10 tracks.The different elements and changes from more mainstream music was more of a challenge.At least as I was interpreting it. Syncing one of your high bpm tracks to images would bea real tester. I mean Google images would struggle to keep up with the pace. Davy Quote
gh6539 Posted March 16, 2011 Report Posted March 16, 2011 Davy,Only one word describes this show and it is Stunning. Well Done!Regards,George Quote
dpletts Posted March 16, 2011 Report Posted March 16, 2011 Davy,Thanks for the explanation. I am more inclined to go for 120 or 90 or even 60 bmp these days for PTE as they line up with seconds in the PTE timeline rather better. Maybe, though, that's not a problem for you? There is the possibility of slowing down the 140 bpm tracks to 120 bmp, but slowing tracks down can sometimes result in audio distortion.It is very pleasing to know that you like my music enough to want to make use of it. I'm rather flattered I must say. Thank you.David Quote
coopernatural Posted March 17, 2011 Author Report Posted March 17, 2011 Hi George,Thanks for watching and your comment.it's hard to beat 'Stunning' as a word to sum things up David,I know what you mean about the distortion induced by slowing things down.Makes things sound sort of glitchy. I use the time tested 'suck it and see'method.Will get back to you about some music.Thanks.Davy Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.