Igor Posted May 23, 2012 Report Posted May 23, 2012 We're working hard to prepare the new version - PicturesToExe Deluxe 7.5.When we finish the new timeline with audio editing we will publish the first beta version.Another new feature of the next version will be fully customizable toolbars on the main window of PicturesToExe. You can re-arrange buttons, hide unused ones, or add advanced buttons for the most used functions, move buttons between top and bottom toolbars.PicturesToExe Deluxe 7.5 will bring the following major improvements:1. New timeline with audio editing (in progress)2. New slide list (almost done)3. New file tree (almost done)4. Updated design of the main window (done)5. Updated design of the Project options options window (done)6. Updated design of the of the Slide options window (done)7. New manager of transition effects with preview (done)8. Editor of custom transition effects (done)9. Customizable toolbars on the main window (in progress)10. New AVI output window with same design as HD video output + built-in video codec (done)11. Refreshed design of PicturesToExe (done)12. New graphical engine for future improvements and effects (almost done)13. New Settings of PicturesToExe window with all program options (done)14. Improved playback of video clips and better support of video formats (done) Quote
Lin Evans Posted May 23, 2012 Report Posted May 23, 2012 Hi Igor,Any editing capability for audio on video clips - such as fade-in, fade-out?Thanks,Lin Quote
xahu34 Posted May 23, 2012 Report Posted May 23, 2012 Again my question from March 27: With the new AVI output, will it be possible to create AVI videos that are larger that 2 GB?Regards,Xaver Quote
Guest Yachtsman1 Posted May 23, 2012 Report Posted May 23, 2012 Hi IgorRe "We're working hard to prepare the new version - PicturesToExe Deluxe 7.5."Does that mean these upgrades are not available on the for life standard version.?Regards EricYachtsman1. Quote
Cèlou Posted May 23, 2012 Report Posted May 23, 2012 PTE is a great version 7.0.5. PTE 7.5 will be a great version and I can not wait to taste all these innovations. Congratulations to you and Igor to your team. Can you give us a track, to know to what period we may have our favorite tool? Quote
orizaba Posted May 23, 2012 Report Posted May 23, 2012 Igor,What about masks in 7.5? ("negative" mask, as suggested before)What about alpha channel and chroma key (as recently spoken) for a future upgrade?Thanks. Quote
Igor Posted May 24, 2012 Author Report Posted May 24, 2012 Any editing capability for audio on video clips - such as fade-in, fade-out?Lin,Yes for audio clips. Can't say about video clips yet.Again my question from March 27: With the new AVI output, will it be possible to create AVI videos that are larger that 2 GB?Xaver,Yes if you make an AVI file with our built-in video codec MPEG4-ASP. MPEG4-ASP is equals to XVID and DIVX. I just checked up this function and successfully created 2.7 GB AVI video file.Re "We're working hard to prepare the new version - PicturesToExe Deluxe 7.5."Does that mean these upgrades are not available on the for life standard version.?Regards EricOf course, it will be a free upgrade to version 7.5 for users of the old Standard edition. Excluding video output options which are part of Deluxe license.For the AVI output we did an exception to the rule, because AVI output always was a part of the Standard edition. So you additionally get for free fully reworked AVI video output with built-in video codecs. Creating a AVI video file is very simple now.PTE is a great version 7.0.5.PTE 7.5 will be a great version and I can not wait to taste all these innovations.Congratulations to you and Igor to your team.Can you give us a track, to know to what period we may have our favorite tool? I think about June-July for the first beta version.What about masks in 7.5? ("negative" mask, as suggested before)What about alpha channel and chroma key (as recently spoken) for a future upgrade?Not in this version, sorry. Quote
deskjet1uk Posted May 24, 2012 Report Posted May 24, 2012 Hello Igor,Thank you to you and your team for all the hard work and I look forward to using the new version.regardsRalph Quote
orizaba Posted May 26, 2012 Report Posted May 26, 2012 We're working hard to prepare the new version - PicturesToExe Deluxe 7.5.When we finish the new timeline with audio editing we will publish the first beta version.Another new feature of the next version will be fully customizable toolbars on the main window of PicturesToExe. You can re-arrange buttons, hide unused ones, or add advanced buttons for the most used functions, move buttons between top and bottom toolbars.PicturesToExe Deluxe 7.5 will bring the following major improvements:1. New timeline with audio editing (in progress)2. New slide list (almost done)3. New file tree (almost done)4. Updated design of the main window (done)5. Updated design of the Project options options window (done)6. Updated design of the of the Slide options window (done)7. New manager of transition effects with preview (done)8. Editor of custom transition effects (done)9. Customizable toolbars on the main window (in progress)10. New AVI output window with same design as HD video output + built-in video codec (done)11. Refreshed design of PicturesToExe (done)12. New graphical engine for future improvements and effects (almost done)13. New Settings of PicturesToExe window with all program options (done)14. Improved playback of video clips and better support of video formats (done)Igor,Are you intending to introduce (hopefuly in v7.5) "Setting up Speed Options" for 3D parameters?It's somewhat disapointing to put a Slowdown in a Zoom, for example, and if picture includes, for example, a "Rotate X", the Zoom effect ends slowly but Rotation not, which turns Rotation not useable (not a perfect combination in most cases).Again, what about "negative masks"? You already said "not now". Are you intending it for soon?Thanks. Quote
xahu34 Posted May 26, 2012 Report Posted May 26, 2012 ...It's somewhat disapointing to put a Slowdown in a Zoom, for example, and if picture includes, for example, a "Rotate X", the Zoom effect ends slowly but Rotation not, which turns Rotation not useable (not a perfect combination in most cases)....The speed options for a normal Rotate also work for Rotate X and Rotate Y. The speed options for a normal Pan also work for Pan Z.Regards,Xaver Quote
orizaba Posted May 26, 2012 Report Posted May 26, 2012 The speed options for a normal Rotate also work for Rotate X and Rotate Y. The speed options for a normal Pan also work for Pan Z.Regards,XaverThanks very much Xaver.Who would guess? Not intuitive, at least for me (separate fields, any indication...)Yes, I just tried and it works! And this offers possibility of a lot of real nice effects, I am happy.Thanks again.Regards,JosePS: Any idea of this kind about "negative masks"? Quote
BEB Posted May 27, 2012 Report Posted May 27, 2012 Can someone explain what a negative mask will do. I can't say I am entirely sure? Quote
orizaba Posted May 27, 2012 Report Posted May 27, 2012 Can someone explain what a negative mask will do. I can't say I am entirely sure?As I put it, "negative masks", not negative masks...Some 2 years ago I "explained": a mask which let pass the outside space, instead of the inside space.Got it? Quote
fh1805 Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 As I put it, "negative masks", not negative masks... a mask which let pass the outside space, instead of the inside space.Jose,If you make your own masks, isn't this just a case of reversing your process? If you currently start with a white slide and paint black on it then, to create a "negative mask", all you would do would be start with a black slide and paint it white! Or were you, in your original post, asking for there to be two more preset masks "Negative circle" and "Negative rectangle" (to use your terminology)?Peter Quote
davegee Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 negative masks are easy to produce in any software with an invert selection function.dg Quote
xahu34 Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 ...Who would guess? Not intuitive, at least for me (separate fields, any indication...)...You should keep in mind that images in PTE are now 3D-objects. An image is to be regarded as a rigid body in a 3D-space, having 6 degrees of freedom, i. e. the position of its center (parameters: Pan X, Pan Y, Pan Z) and a 3D-rotation around the center (parameters: PTE Standard Rotation, Rotate X, Rotate Y). Now, if you program an animation, you do it by defining a new position of the center and 3 new angles. Thus, the animation consists of a 3D-Pan, and of a 3D-Rotation, and for each of both parts you just have one set of speed options. It's OK, isn't it?Regards,Xaver Quote
xahu34 Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 ... Any idea of this kind about "negative masks"?The predefined masks, as they are today, work well by defining the outside part as transparent. What about the outside part in case of inverted versions of the given predefined masks. Should it be defined as opaque? I don't know if this will lead to performance problems?Regards,Xaver Quote
orizaba Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 Jose,If you make your own masks, isn't this just a case of reversing your process? If you currently start with a white slide and paint black on it then, to create a "negative mask", all you would do would be start with a black slide and paint it white! Or were you, in your original post, asking for there to be two more preset masks "Negative circle" and "Negative rectangle" (to use your terminology)?PeterYes, when I am "forced" to make my own "negative masks" (such as a simple rectangule or circle) that's what I make.For sure, I was refering to 2 more PTE presets, so avoiding such own work for these 2 simple masks.Jose Quote
orizaba Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 The predefined masks, as they are today, work well by defining the outside part as transparent. What about the outside part in case of inverted versions of the given predefined masks. Should it be defined as opaque? I don't know if this will lead to performance problems?Regards,XaverThanks for explanations about 3D. Clear.Concerning "negative masks", that's a question for Igor to reply!I have no idea about eventual performance problems with opaque outside... but it seems to me that no problems at all!And such "negative" presets would avoid a lot of work to users.Regards,Jose Quote
orizaba Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 negative masks are easy to produce in any software with an invert selection function.dgThat's what I think! Why not inside PTE itself, Igor? Quote
xahu34 Posted May 28, 2012 Report Posted May 28, 2012 Jose,let me start with the remark that I would like to see more flexibility for the predefined masks, as well. On the other hand, just having the inverted versions of the given predefined masks is not what I would consider as very helpful. We should ask for a more sophisticated model. Presently we have predefined white circles or rectangles, where the complete outside part is black (keeping in mind that the outside part of a mask is defined to be transparent). If you ask for the negative mask, you seem to want to see black circles or rectangles whose complete outside parts are white. As I already said, I have my doubts that this will be good for the overall performance, and in many cases the new mask effects can be achieved with standard masks, as we have them today, just by changing the order of the layers.Regards,Xaver Quote
Igor Posted May 29, 2012 Author Report Posted May 29, 2012 Jose,This suggestion ("negative" mask) in our TODO list. Thanks.But Xaver is right. There are technical difficulties with this kind of a mask. It necessary to change the mask engine. Our programmer who is responsible for this code is very busy now with rewriting of the graphical engine for version 7.5. Quote
orizaba Posted May 29, 2012 Report Posted May 29, 2012 Jose,This suggestion ("negative" mask) in our TODO list. Thanks.But Xaver is right. There are technical difficulties with this kind of a mask. It necessary to change the mask engine. Our programmer who is responsible for this code is very busy now with rewriting of the graphical engine for version 7.5.Thanks Igor (assuming that "TODO" list means future improvements...! "TODO"...?)Good news!Jose Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.