tom95521 Posted May 7, 2014 Report Posted May 7, 2014 I thought 4K was the sweet spot for image resizing but I guess 8K is not too far away (26MP images). Zoom in on one of the native resolution computer generated virtual reality images and be amazed.screen captures from Crysis 3https://secure.flickr.com/photos/k_putt/sets/72157644191959442/fromhttp://www.loadthegame.com/2014/05/07/crysis-3-running-8k-resolution-looks-simply-amazing/I have no idea how much an 8K HDTV or video camera would cost. That's probably why they are computer generated graphics.Tom Quote
Barry Beckham Posted May 8, 2014 Report Posted May 8, 2014 Well, there is a real problem, most Camera club committees can't shake themselves away from 1024*768 in case it brings on the end of their world as they know it, poor solesBy the time they reach this level we will be in the middle of the next ice age Remember those on this forum not too far away kicking and screaming that they would never let go of 1024*768 Quote
tom95521 Posted May 8, 2014 Author Report Posted May 8, 2014 The human eye is equal to a 52 MP camera in resolution. So an 8K resolution monitor that can display 33 MP images is not unreasonable. Faster GPUs are on the horizon.Not sure why anyone would want to use 1024x768 in the 21st century. Projectors have increased in resolution and dropped in price. I think the minimum resolution should be 1920x1080.8K = 7680 × 4320 resolutionhttp://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/cameras-vs-human-eye.htmTom Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.