Lin Evans Posted August 31, 2007 Report Share Posted August 31, 2007 Just an aside - Casio announced a new high speed 6 megapixel camera concept with 12x optical zoom from about 35 to 430 (approx) mm. Not too unusual except it shoots 300 frames per second. That's not a typo - three hundred frames per second in VGA mode and at full six megapixels it shoots 60 frames per second continuously. Lin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lin Evans Posted September 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 I thought somebody would get the significance of this for PTE but think of it like this. You record high speed image sequences, then put them into your slideshow at slow sequenced play back and get an incredible world not possible from normal still or motion photography. Guys this is tailor made for PTE's high resolution playback.Look at these movie clips. Click around on this link and think about the possibilities !!!http://world.casio.com/ngdc/en/LinJust an aside - Casio announced a new high speed 6 megapixel camera with 12x optical zoom from about 35 to 430 (approx) mm. Not too unusual except it shoots 300 frames per second. That's not a typo - three hundred frames per second in VGA mode and at full six megapixels it shoots 60 frames per second continuously. Lin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmccammon Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Thanks for the information Lin. Sports shooters will love this camera. Personally, I'm thinking about waterfalls and wildlife. I'll be tracking the release of the camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil Posted September 4, 2007 Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 Why not just buy a video camera if you want to record action in this way?Am I missing the point?Neil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Cox Posted September 4, 2007 Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 big difference between video and still photographyif he wants a frame hi quality he does not have to rip the videoi shoot continuous shots with my digital at max zoom to cover my butt -- very difficult to keep on action subjects hand held or even moving shipscamera specs seehttp://tinyurl.com/2jghd7ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lin Evans Posted September 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 Yes Neil,Video cameras record perhaps 30 frames per second and at not over 2 megapixel resolution for even a high end unit.This records ten times that frame rate at VGA resolution (300 frames per second) and at full six megapixel resolution records twice the frame rate of the movie camers.This means you can then slow the frames for play back and create the equivalent of time lapse for very fast events such as seeing water splash, watching the motion of a golf swing, the distortion of the ball as it is struck by the baseball bat, etc.LinWhy not just buy a video camera if you want to record action in this way?Am I missing the point?Neil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ome_toon Posted September 4, 2007 Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 The big question is of course how many photo's one can take before the buffer runs out. As far as i know there's no memorycard fast enough to sustain those kind of speeds.The usability of this feature would be seriously compromised if you can ony sustain those speeds for a second or two, especially for the 300 fps movie function.Next the question comes to mind about the picture quality, with shuttertimes of 1/60 you need quite a bit of light or shoot at high iso settings. I would like to see some serious every day use to be convinced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmccammon Posted September 4, 2007 Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 Take a look at the example sequences shown via Lin's link to the Casio prototype site. Sure looks to me like a 20-30 second slow-mo playback of a short event can be very effective in a wide variety of lighting conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lin Evans Posted September 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 Buffering capabiliies depend on primarily the file size. The new Nikon D3 has the ability to shoot 9 frames per second for 64 frames and that's a 12 megapixel jpg. With only a megapixel file that would equal 768 frames and the VGA would files would probably be about a quarter meg at most which would equal 3072 frames at 300 fps or at least 10 seconds worth with media available today.60 fps is useful even if only for reasonably well lit sporting events. I use 15 frames per second all the time and get excellent results.LinThe big question is of course how many photo's one can take before the buffer runs out. As far as i know there's no memorycard fast enough to sustain those kind of speeds.The usability of this feature would be seriously compromised if you can ony sustain those speeds for a second or two, especially for the 300 fps movie function.Next the question comes to mind about the picture quality, with shuttertimes of 1/60 you need quite a bit of light or shoot at high iso settings. I would like to see some serious every day use to be convinced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.