gourmetphoto Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 Does anyone know of a program (preferably free or inexpensive) that will easily compress a batch of images? Quote
Ken Cox Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 do you want to put them in a zipfile or are you after something elseken Quote
JRR Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 If you mean compress as in "lower quality jpg", Irfanview, and PhotoShop can do that in batch processing. Quote
Ken Cox Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 seehttp://irfanview.tuwien.ac.at/make sure you not only get the irfanview program, but also get the pluginsken Quote
jimlarkey Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 Have you considered JPEG Packer by JSoft? http://www.zdnet.com.au/downloads/pc/swinf...,4575110,00.htmThere is a version 2 that I have. Features advertised are as follows:-------------------------------- JPEG Packer Version 2 - August 2001-------------------------------------Use this program for free, for YOUR PERSONAL USE ONLY.You cannot sell, distribute or make any kind of business with this program, or any of it's resources.If you want to aqquire this program for business purposes, please contact me by email: jsoftw@yahoo.ca--------------------------------------------------------A cool utility to pack your JPG pictures into a single file.- Create standalone, PPS-style, full-screen slideshows to send to your friends.- Create photo albums, add comments or notes to each picture, and easily browse them, using the thumbnail viewer.- Encript and password protect your personal pictures.- Save disk space by packing all those small jpg files. Quote
gourmetphoto Posted July 25, 2003 Author Report Posted July 25, 2003 I guess basically I'm just trying to find a system that makes quality slideshows!! (I own a portrait studio). Because my files are so large, I need to make them smaller so pics to exe works better without loosing quality on my images.Honestly....i'm just plain out having a hard time with pics to exe. I wish I could get my hands on a decent manual that will explain everything well. I feel like I'm wasting a lot of time trying to learn how to produce high end slideshows by trial & error with this program.Anyway, back to jpegs. I downloaded a free software called easy thumbnails. from www.fookes.com Its ok but I had a few images that turned out with really poor quality.I guess I just need to keep testing until I get it right. Quote
alrobin Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 Since you are in the professional portrait photo business, you will be looking for quality in the compressed photos as well. I would venture to suggest that only a professional program like Photoshop, Photopaint, etc., will give you the quality you are looking for as they use very sophisticated algorithms for interpolating, etc., in order to change image sizes, and to compress the resulting images even further for use in PTE. Quote
Ken Cox Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 seehttp://www.picturestoexe.com/forums//index...T&f=3&t=87&st=0look for fernandezfor the "original" turorialmost people on the forum make their images +- 100kb each in size -- for web images +- 75 kb is sufficient. if you search this forum for projection you will see values that various members use successfully. ken Quote
Barry Beckham Posted July 25, 2003 Report Posted July 25, 2003 gourmetphotoThere is a Pics2exe tutorial CD available here http://www.barrybeckham.co.uk/tutorials/tu...udio_visual.htm that will take you through what you need to know and it doesn't cost a bundle either.bbdigital Quote
OGL Posted July 26, 2003 Report Posted July 26, 2003 UleadSmartSaver v3 is best JPG compressor.Regards,Oleg Quote
think(box) Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Oleg,For sure there are many who want to know what is the best compressor on the market. You have suggested that Ulead SmartSaver Pro v3.0 is at the top. I found a good article about this software from 3 years ago when SSPv3 was released, and little more since that time:Click for July 12, 2000 article found at "CreativePro.com" Notably this quote tells about separate quality and chroma compression controls: If you are saving JPEG images instead, you can take advantage of separate compression controls for quality and chroma. When used properly, these tools help you to generate faster-downloading pictures without compromising quality.So my question is this: In three years no one has beat Ulead's compression performance? If there are no strong opinions to the contrary then this software is worth a look. Thank you! Quote
alrobin Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 It seems to be called "Photo Impact" now. (see this web site ).Otherwise, I don't know anything about it. Sounds like a good editor, though, and the price ($80) is right.Edited: Adobe's "Photoshop Elements" is also a bargain, but without some of the features, apparently. See this review in Business Week . Quote
think(box) Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Thanks Al - I can't find anything that says SmartSaver Pro has been bundled or combined with PhotoImpact.On Ulead's home page, holding mouse cursor over "Products" active menu, and then over "Web design" active menu, both products appear separately. Here are the links to all:Click for Ulead HomeClick for Ulead PhotoImpactClick for Ulead SmartSaver ProNow I'll check out your Business Week article link - thanks! Quote
alrobin Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Bill, right you are! I didn't explore far enough. I guess SmartSaver is just a photo editor, whereas Photo Impact also has some "slice and dice" web-authoring capabilities similar to Adobe's "Image Ready". They both sound good.It's interesting that all of the articles given as testimonials for SmartSaver are year-2000 vintage. Quote
think(box) Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 OK - From Business Week (October 28, 2002) PhotoImpact is said to beat Photoshop Elements, but it doesn't have hand-holding for easier use, and doesn't have a picture browser. SmartSaver Pro (not mentioned in that article) is in a different class, specifically aimed at Web's tight needs in terms of file size and web versatility.So the big question is this: Does PhotoImpact have the same compression engine as SmartSaver Pro under the hood???For someone with no decent Photoshop-class tool, PhotoImpact is a good consideration. For me, a special purpose tool is preferable. In fact, anything with a Web focus is preferable.Oleg, can you add to this? Quote
think(box) Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Al - We posted at same time! "Image Ready" vs. the "Ulead camp" should be studied before buying. Quote
alrobin Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Yes, I suspect "PhotoImpact" is easier to master than ImageReady, but ImageReady has some pretty awesome capabilities, especially when used as a plug-in with Photoshop.I created a map of Canada on my web site with ImageReady which would have been difficult with just Front Page and Photoshop to work with. You can see it HERE if you're interested. As you probably know, Photoshop 7 has ImageReady bundled in with it. (I think PS 6 had it too.) Quote
Guest guru Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 I think one of the best jpg compressors on the market is "JPG Optimizer" by Xat.com, thanks to its "Magicompress" selective algorithm. The results are even better than in Adobe ImageReady, but this software is much cheaper ($29).Give a look to examples in this page. Quote
boxig Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Agree with Guido - "JPG Optimizer" is the best I know. Quote
OGL Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Hello Al, Bill and other readers of this topic!- 1. Jul 25 2003, 09:26 PM alrobin wrote:I would venture to suggest that only a professional program like Photoshop, Photopaint, etc., will give you the quality you are looking for as they use very sophisticated algorithms for interpolating, etc., in order to change image sizes, and to compress the resulting images even further for use in PTE. Yes Al, you are ridht. Professional ( graphical or sound) editors is professional editors... - 2. Jul 28 2003, 01:56 PM think(box) wrote:So my question is this: In three years no one has beat Ulead's compression performance?Bill, Ulead create "absolute" JPEG compressor If there are no strong opinions to the contrary then this software is worth a look.No problem! I upload on "soft" part of my site HEREUleadSmartSaverPro v3 with "viagra". You may play with this. If this You to like, You can buy on Ulead site version without viagra. - 3.So the big question is this: Does PhotoImpact have the same compression engine as SmartSaver Pro under the hood???Bill, SmartSaver is one of Plugins of UleadPhotoimpact v7 and v8As you probably know, Photoshop 7 has ImageReady bundled in with it. (I think PS 6 had it too.) Yes Al, it is right.- 4.guru:I think one of the best jpg compressors on the market is "JPG Optimizer" byboxig:Agree with Guido - "JPG Optimizer" is the best I know. May be, may be... I think:Best - Image Optimizer v4.1 and high (but this very "heavy" program)Very good - Ulead Smart Saver Pro v3 ( I use this for my slidefilms )Good - Adobe Photo Shop v6, v7So-so - JPG Optimizer Utilites - no comments And sorry my bad Englich! Regards,Oleg Quote
think(box) Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Wow, responding to seven quotes in one reply! A great set of options and opinions - and evaluation work to do! Thanks Oleg and everyone. And Al, that Canada6 map that you linked for us is really cool. Imagine a 3-D globe constructed that way! Quote
alrobin Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Thanks, Bill! It was fun making it, but I think I'll leave the 3D version to someone else! Quote
Guest guru Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Hi Al !Even in 2D your image is an excellent example of interactive map. All my compliments for this work but also for the whole site! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.